Comments on: Mr. & Ms. Amerikkka

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:57:34 +0000

Butterworth is truly an idiot! He’s one of those pathetic soles who rotely repeats that same old cliche, “Free speech has consequences.” He expects that statement to end the discussion.

Well, Mr. Misguided-Issue-Spotter-Butterworth, if something said is “free speech,” then, by definition, it is “protected speech.” That means it’s supposed to be protected from UNLAWFUL consequences.

When the Pearcys placed the dummy on their house, they engaged in protected speech. Your defamatory speech and tortious interference with Ms. Pearcy’s business relationship–your so-called “consequences”–were not protected speech. Your “consequences” are exactly the kind of thing from which the First Amendment is intended to protect us all.

Butterworth is an idiot who gives conservatives a bad name.

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:30:14 +0000

Great posts today. Are you taking Enzyte now?
Be nice to Ralph. You should see the trolls the Frog Blog keeps sending.

By: Preston Taylor Holmes

Preston Taylor Holmes — Tue, 19 Apr 2005 02:49:29 +0000

Actually, Mark, I was half joking about the countersuit. I don’t think you’ll actually be sued – I think it’s just a bunch of blustering from a couple of polesmoking idiots.

And thanks for the lesson in civil litigation, Ralph. Without you, I’d be adrift on a sea of ignunce.

By: Hector Vex's Infotainment

Hector Vex's Infotainment — Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:14:06 +0000

Hey Pearcy – get the fuck out
You, Mr. Pearcy & Mrs. Pearcy ARE NOT AMERICANS. Let me tell you why. You denounce America by saying fuck our government, and burn the American flag. You are no longer Americans in my mind, and

By: Welcome To Andi's World

Welcome To Andi's World — Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:34:43 +0000

California Sickos
Remember Stephen and Virginia Pearcy? They’re the lovely little California couple who thought a great way to express their opposition to the war in Iraq would be to hang an effigy of a dead American soldier on their house (twice). Well, now it seems t…

By: Diggers Realm

Diggers Realm — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:53:56 +0000

Stephen And Virginia Pearcy Threaten Bloggers With Lawsuits
You remember the Pearcy’s, the ones who hung a soldier effigy from their second house in Sacramento while they ran off to Berkeley forcing their neighbors and tenants to deal with the fallout of their political hate speech. Well…

By: SixHertz

SixHertz — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:16:16 +0000

You know, with these libertards, I really don’t know any conservative equivalents on the opposite spectrum. Just how nuts can someone get?

Apparently, very.

By: mark butterworth

mark butterworth — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:32:11 +0000

I will countersue for damages, attorney’s fees (if I can’t get some pro bono work), and court costs, but I am going to wait for Pearcy to file against me, although I think I could probably make a pre-emptive strike on a number of issues like prior restraint, and anti-SLAPP suit law.

If he does go to an attorney who actually knows the law, Pearcy will learn that he’s as bad a lawyer as an American.

By: Ralph

Ralph — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:21:32 +0000

Attn Genius: One doesn’t have to commit an illegal act in order to be sued.:roll:

By: Hector Vex

Hector Vex — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:20:05 +0000

Won’t that make them hypocrites? I mean, they are pissed because someone else is expression their free speech in retaliation to their own free speech?

Liberals. Geez. Hell, even liberals are better than these losers. Let’s get a gang together and toss their asses over the mexican border.