Criminals, Islamists, San Francisco is Yours! Take It!
November 9th, 2005 at 8:40 am by Preston Taylor HolmesSan Francissy voters pranced to the polls yesterday and took away the right of citizens to defend themselves.
The gun ban prohibits the manufacture and sale of all firearms and ammunition in the city, and makes it illegal for residents to keep handguns in their homes or businesses.
Only two other major U.S. cities _ Washington and Chicago _ have implemented such sweeping handgun bans.
With all precincts reporting early Wednesday, 58 percent of voters backed the proposed gun ban while 42 percent opposed it.
Although law enforcement, security guards and others who require weapons for work are exempt from the measure, current handgun owners would have to surrender their firearms by April.
TURN IN YOUR GUNS, CITIZENS.
San Fran voters also took the opportunity yesterday to slap the military in the face by banning military recruiting at colleges and high schools.
It encourages city officials and university administrators to exclude recruiters and create scholarships and training programs that would reduce the military’s appeal to young adults.
Well, since the military uses GUNS, it’s probably for the best. As soon as the military decides to engage in combat by slap-fights and hair-pulling, San Fran will be a recruiting hotbed, I’m certain.
Image lifted (and modified) from Vinnie’s “Sorry France” post.
November 9th, 2005 at 11:40 am
Gee, what a principled stand from the Bay.
So, should there ever be an invasion onto its shores, might one suggest that the rest of the state and the country not save it from demise… you know, because of the priciple? Yeah, yeah, crazy talk I know. But can the place get any battier? When one sets up Utopia, one must suffer its consequences.
November 9th, 2005 at 12:40 pm
San Francisco
Fifty-eight percent of San Franciscans have lost their collective mind….
Then, there are those 60% of San Franciscans who support the troops but not “BushÂ’s” war…
November 9th, 2005 at 12:52 pm
I don’t have a gun but I feel safe in my home becasue my husband has a gun, my neighbors have guns and no one has ever been hurt or shot at, they have them mainly for peace of mind or needed protection.
To live in a city where only bad people have guns would never be a place where I would want to live.
They voted against allowing military recruiters to speak with to their high schools but they make sure that they don’t push it too far so they can still get the $$ that they want to spend on whatever.
When the city is overrun by the people with guns they need to hire their own army to take care of them becasue they are above & beyond the true Americans in the military.
San Franicisco has always been one of my favorite cities to visit and unfortunately it is now one that I will never visit again, me & my money will go where the people who are proud to be Americans live.
November 9th, 2005 at 1:01 pm
What a complete, fukkin’ travesty. Even the Police Dept. in SF was against Prop. H. I signed a petition 15 years ago to try and get California seperated into 3 states, but it failed to get enough signatures or was somehow lost in the proverbial “legislative mail”.
November 9th, 2005 at 1:11 pm
Just me – it is a damn shame that a city that is so beautiful (if you can find a vantage point that doesn’t have a homeless person obscuring your view) can be so filled with such a bunch of drooling Marxists.
With apologies to Jeff from Beautiful Atrocities, when the shit hits the fan in San Fran – whether it be in the form of earthquake, islamofascism, whatever, I say FEMA sends their calls directly to the answering machine. If they want to be victims, let’s let ‘em be victims.
November 9th, 2005 at 1:44 pm
Like I said before, if ever the Big One (big damn earthquake for you non-Califorons) hits and there’s New Orleans-style anarchy in the Bay Area, I’m going into San Francisco and looting. A few months ago I said it was because the hippies didn’t believe in guns and I was less likely to meet any resistance.
But now? Man, they just totally made it easier for a potential lawbreaker such as myself. But I’m keepin’ in real in Oakland, y’know whut i’m sayin’?
Dumb Leftist Hippie fuckups. I hope they learn their lesson, France-style. And I hope that lawlessness temporarily prevails in the power outages that would follow an 8+ on the Richter scale such that I might help with the instruction.
November 9th, 2005 at 1:50 pm
Although law enforcement, security guards and others who require weapons for work are exempt from the measure, current handgun owners would have to surrender their firearms by April.
What about like drug dealers, pimps, and hitmen? They require weapons for work, right? So they’ll be allowed to remain strapped? Last time I checked “popping caps in various mutha-fukkas asses” was in the job description for all of those professions…
November 9th, 2005 at 4:26 pm
Your anti-gay innuendo is stupid. Grow up. What is the point.
“San Francissy”
“slap-fights and hair-pulling”
Anyway, there was an active gay group against the gun ban, pinkpistols.org. “Armed gays don’t get bashed” is their slogan.
November 9th, 2005 at 5:20 pm
The day after …
Today’s dose of NIF – News, Interesting & Funny … It’s the Free Jack Idema Blogburst! (+ Open Trackbacks)
November 9th, 2005 at 5:54 pm
Hey now. Gun bans work. Just look at Washington, DC.
November 9th, 2005 at 6:06 pm
The ironic thing is, if the islamists nuked San Francisco, this is what would happen:
1. The liberals would blame the conservatives, not the islamists.
2. The conservatives wouldn’t care that SF got wiped out.
3. The moderates/independents wouldn’t care that SF got wiped out.
4. Get out of jail free card for islamofascists.
5. SixHertz schadenfreude.
And I especially like Smantix’ comment. Sounds like crooks’ll have a great time at the local 7/11.
November 9th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
hey SF against H, you nancy-pants, you ever been to san francisco? all the Red America fears which you think are exaggerated and just paranoid hyperbole are all true.
makes me sick that i can watch my beloved SF Bay Area devolving right before my eyes.
November 9th, 2005 at 6:43 pm
Pardon the simplicity of the question, but isn’t a gun ban like this unconstitutional?
November 9th, 2005 at 7:34 pm
Jeez, SF against H, can’t we have a little fun with stereotypes? Don’t be so quick on the offended-trigger.
Besides, I’m from a very pro-gay town. Hell, we even have the Womens Basketball Hall of Fame.
It doesn’t get any gayer than that.
BTW, I like the pink pistols organization. I don’t care what color the guns are as long as they work. An armed society is a polite society.
November 9th, 2005 at 8:08 pm
That comment is so telling, Preston.
I always knew you were a cocksucker.
November 9th, 2005 at 8:13 pm
Oh, in case anyone cared, from top to bottom, left to right:
Ruger 10/22 .22 cal
Weatherby .300 WinMag
Mossberg .410 ga
Ruger 9mm
Colt Trooper Mk III .357
I used to have a Winchester 12 ga and a Remington .270, but I traded ‘em in for the .357.
And I have the next two days off, I’m going shopping, in honor of my adopted hometown San Francisco, where I was stationed for a year and a half at Treasure Island.
November 9th, 2005 at 9:51 pm
Now Vinnie, that’s not very nice.
But then again, after re-reading my post, I can see why I deserved to be attacked.
So be it. Bastard.
November 10th, 2005 at 1:48 am
Same California, Different Day…
Anyway, read on. Some good links here. Check them all out. And then comment to show comprehension.