Who Is “Xxxxxxx”?
September 29th, 2006 at 9:26 pm by CrankyBecause our loyal fans demand it – Our obligatory Foley post.
Rep. Foley is a scumbag. No ifs, ands or buts about it. But why does ABC protect the identity of his chat buddy?
I suspect election year partisan politics.
UPDATE:
I think someone has an idea of who Xxxxxx just might be.
September 29th, 2006 at 10:21 pm
Thanks Cranky! That was even funnier than I was expecting!
You guys are vying for 2nd-tier blog status…
September 29th, 2006 at 10:53 pm
Pelosi always spanks it herself. Who else would want the displeasure?
September 30th, 2006 at 2:43 am
An October surprise in Septemeber. I am sure we will see several more of these.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX is protected because he is a minor.
September 30th, 2006 at 10:53 am
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX is protected because he is a minor.
That’s all well and good Sharon, but who is Xxxxxxx? Just like you liberals to change the subject.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:12 am
Bravo, Cranky! LMAO here.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:22 am
Since when is it bad to protect the identity of a minor…
And since when is it bad to be a liberal!? I’d rather be a liberal, than a knee-jerk neo-con…at least I THINK for myself!
September 30th, 2006 at 11:30 am
Mr. Evil,
Sharon is a blog buddy and all around nice person with a sense of humor.
That said, Rep. Foley can still get out of this mess by claiming that he is a “Gay American” and taking it to Oprah. This might be the key difference between “D” and “R” politically speaking.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:38 am
I’ll question the timing on it. When did this take place? Because if it’s been early this year or last year this was put on ice until now.
Unarguably worse than Torricelli’s last minute capitulation over corruption that led to Frank Lautenberg rising from the grave in NJ a few years ago. Florida Reps need to get his name off the fricking ballot.
The minor’s identity should be protected and the Page system should be done away with.
Of course I’m against sending our representatives to Washington too. We live in a day and age where technology can cease your public servants from “losing touch with the people” by sending them hundreds and thousands of miles away.
T.O. didn’t attempt to kill himself. But Foley should.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:44 am
Cranky,
Didn’t know you were a “knee-jerk” neo-con. Why the hell didn’t you tell me…maybe I wouldn’t spend so much time hanging around here…
I thought you were just a “jerk” neo-con.
Thank you so much Fred for helping me see the light. And tread lightly when Cranky toad blogs…or you will REALLY get it!
September 30th, 2006 at 11:50 am
“Liberals think for themselves”. That is too fucking funny. The last few weeks showed the illiterati of the liberal galaxy aligning to get their Presidential Rugburn on so that they could more effectively communicate party talking points.
That’s not “thinking for yourself” – that’s “selling out”.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:53 am
Hey Fred, why don’t you take your standard i-don’t-have-a-sense-of-humor-brand-liberal-talking-points and head back to the bath house. If that’s the best you can do, I suggest you ask Sharon for admittance to lefty finishing school. Dolt.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:56 am
You got me pegged Billy. The knees never enter into it.
Toads? Well just say you mess with the Order of Anura, you’ve messed with me.
September 30th, 2006 at 12:07 pm
I know this post is “partisan” but I’m sure we all, as Smantix pointed out, need to see this guy fry. That crosses both sides of the aisle.
What I find fascinating is the comments on the ABC blog. Most conservative comments start out with “As a conservative, I’m disgusted/horrified/outraged, etc. …” and most of the Democratic comments with “you hippocrits… u.r. sexshually repressed.”
Regarding the exploitation of minors, I think Dennis Miller put it best.
“You’ve got to promise me if…you ever get to the point in your life when you are so puzzled, confused and frightened that you
feel the only way out is to abuse or molest a kid, well then, you have to kill yourself. You have to lean into the strike
zone and take one for the team.”
Amen.
September 30th, 2006 at 12:52 pm
Found at my-space last night:
CN6mb: So how’s it floating?
Xxxxxx: ribbit ribbit ribbit
CN6mb: Well I don’t know about tadpoles LOL
Xxxxxx: ribbit ribbit
CN6mb: Warts and all?
Xxxxxx: ribbit ribbit ribbit ribbit ROFLMAO!!!!
CN6mb: Ever been frog gigging Joey?
Xxxxxx: ….ribbit!….. :>(
CN6mb: It’s just a figure of speech LOL
Xxxxxx: ribbit ribbit ribbit ribbit
…….ribbit ribbit!!!!!!!
CN6mb: Cool
Could br trouble….
September 30th, 2006 at 1:19 pm
Gordon, Cranky, or whatever the hell your name is…
Your wingnut, non-compassionate views on this whole thing just goes to show how you can’t think for yourself.
I hope this minor’s identity remains protected so that he can continue his journey in exploring his sexuality…without being judged by thugs like you.
And how quickly you come down on this public servant who was simply assisting this kid in his journey. He was showing a pure love you could never understand…er…
Wait.
Foley is a REPUBLICAN?
HA! There you go! Just another example of a Rethuglican exploiting the youth in our country! When will you neo-cons…blah, blah, blah…Bush Lied…blah…blah…blah………
September 30th, 2006 at 6:19 pm
Cranky,
I’m fairly sure Foley’s first call was not to his lawyer, but to an agent. I don’t think he can get on Oprah until he has a book out. If there are more victims, he could get a movie of the week deal.
Yep. We’ve got our priorities right in this country!
September 30th, 2006 at 8:42 pm
What’s come to light is that this exchange took place in Fall of 2005. So these allegations being made public, the way they were, were politically timed for the last minute.
Whoever sat on them allowed Foley to keep going about whatever perverted business he was engaged in so that they could score some political points 30 days before an election.
So basically the story sitters enabled Foley to continue his practices for a year. And thanks to Fred for showing us his true colors. He’s mad at Foley for hitting on the kid when he’s 16 but at the same time he hopes the kid turns out gay so he can hit on him when he’s 18.
Way to go, buddy.
September 30th, 2006 at 9:10 pm
Stik, Unless you have photos, I have no idea what you’re talking about. Back off, mister.
Smantix, If you’re addressing the second Mr. Evil comment… I’m sorry to tell you that that one is the work of a sock puppet. Seriously. Based on the email used, it is a sock puppet we know well.
Sharon, sad but true.
October 1st, 2006 at 10:45 pm
Has anyone seen this from Stop the ACLU, via HotAir?
http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2006/10/01/mark-foley-flashback-if-i-were-one-of-those-sickos/
Would this be considered ironic foreshadowing?
October 1st, 2006 at 11:12 pm
Federal authorities say such messages could result in Foley’s prosecution, under some of the same laws he helped to enact.
Pure karma.
October 2nd, 2006 at 2:28 pm
I know the screen name, first name, and location of the person Mark Foley was instant messaging. He is older than 18 now (possibly 20-21 years of age.) I have tried to contact the MSM about his identity, but no one has gotten back with me. I might release the information I have on Wednesday; I do not want everyone beating down this guy’s door. I will wait to see how this story unfolds.
I also have evidence that the emails have been altered.
October 3rd, 2006 at 3:36 pm
Doesn’t Foleys actions make him a liberal by default? Thought so.