Comments on: California Ballot Initiative Guide

By: ken

ken — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:31:26 +0000

I’m with you on the bulk of these and the reasoning…I hate carve-outs or special taxes. Let ‘em duke it out with everyone else from the general fund. A tax is a tax is a tax…

By: Billy

Billy — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:34:24 +0000

Thanks Annika…taking this with me to the Bird Rock Elementary School Auditorium right now to vote.

I both agree and disagree with YS on 83. Of course we should have a law making these crimes ineligible for parole. The problem is that with all of the voting sex perverts from NoCal, we’d never get that law passed…and if we did, some sex pervert NoCal judge would just throw it out.

So I am voting yes on 83.

Oh yeah. Did anyone get the impression that I think there are a lot of sex pervs in NoCal? Don’t know where I came up with that:

“I do not believe it should be a felony if someone is caught with child pornography for their personal use.”

-Assemblyman Mark Leno-San Francisco

By: Yiddish Steel

Yiddish Steel — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 03:46:37 +0000

Annika,

I’m with you on all your choices except for 83. 83 will cost a fortune and will not make us any safer from these scum-bags. The only thing that will ever work is to make these sex crimes NON-PAROLE ELIGIBLE, PERIOD!! Enforce the laws and uphold the sentences.