<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imaginary Media Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixmeatbuffet.com/archives/2006/11/26/imaginary-media-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixmeatbuffet.com/archives/2006/11/26/imaginary-media-bias/</link>
	<description>This blog was filmed before a live studio audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 12:37:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thelonious Funk</title>
		<link>http://sixmeatbuffet.com/archives/2006/11/26/imaginary-media-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-38716</link>
		<dc:creator>Thelonious Funk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixmeatbuffet.com/archives/2006/11/26/imaginary-media-bias/#comment-38716</guid>
		<description>Two data points (#1: 2005; #2 2006) do not constitute a trend.  Additionally, the premise is based on faulty logic.  The media likes democrats, the democrats win an election, therefore the media reports rosy economics.  You could attribute the change in coverage to any number of things.  One that comes to mind is the fact that no major US cities were leveled by hurricanes this year.  Even if you assume the current retail market is equivalent to last year&#039;s, the big story of summer and fall 2005 would have flavored the covereage nonetheless.  

Of course, we&#039;re also taking at face value Mary Katharine Ham&#039;s selection of sources and reports.  Surely she would show no bias in that.  It&#039;s a blog after all, which is a much more reliable source of information than the pinko leftist mainstream media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two data points (#1: 2005; #2 2006) do not constitute a trend.  Additionally, the premise is based on faulty logic.  The media likes democrats, the democrats win an election, therefore the media reports rosy economics.  You could attribute the change in coverage to any number of things.  One that comes to mind is the fact that no major US cities were leveled by hurricanes this year.  Even if you assume the current retail market is equivalent to last year&#8217;s, the big story of summer and fall 2005 would have flavored the covereage nonetheless.  </p>
<p>Of course, we&#8217;re also taking at face value Mary Katharine Ham&#8217;s selection of sources and reports.  Surely she would show no bias in that.  It&#8217;s a blog after all, which is a much more reliable source of information than the pinko leftist mainstream media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://sixmeatbuffet.com/archives/2006/11/26/imaginary-media-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-38482</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixmeatbuffet.com/archives/2006/11/26/imaginary-media-bias/#comment-38482</guid>
		<description>Just the anticipation of Nancy in control has thousands of crack dealers opening up their tin-can savings accounts and rushing the Wal-Mart for electronics.  At least that&#039;s kinda how the LA Pravda-Times reported it...

I think MKH can show off those new jeans she bought whilst wearing a UT t-shirt...

When is she paying off the bet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the anticipation of Nancy in control has thousands of crack dealers opening up their tin-can savings accounts and rushing the Wal-Mart for electronics.  At least that&#8217;s kinda how the LA Pravda-Times reported it&#8230;</p>
<p>I think MKH can show off those new jeans she bought whilst wearing a UT t-shirt&#8230;</p>
<p>When is she paying off the bet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

