When you reflexively choose “peace” over force or the threat of force you get this:

Since Crittenden puts it better than I could, I’ll just have you follow the links. What else can I add except that Carter still sucks?

Posted by Cranky @ 11:30 am
2 Comments | Permalink | Trackback URI

Comments

:: Trackbacks/Pingbacks ::

No Trackbacks/Pingbacks

:: Comments ::

1. To me, this is the money shot:

   “You’ve had your fun. If they are not free in two days, we will blockade your country. Nothing gets in or out. Two days after that, we will destroy your oil-producing infrastructure. We then have a very long list of your military, political and civilian infrastructure that supports your terrorist and nuclear ambitions that we will begin destroying. We do not intend to invade you. We have no need nor interest in doing so.”

   Simply put, let’s quick dicking around with these a-holes. Let the moonbats scream…Blair should declare war and Bush has the authority to join him.

   And the next time Ahmedinejad speaks in front of his raving loon countrymen, launch a cruise missle at the podium and take him out.

   comment by Billy — Monday, March 26, 2007 @ 11:58 am

   ---

2. “What else can I add except that Carter still sucks?”

   Some bolding of text at the end of that sentence?

   comment by AnonymousDrivel — Monday, March 26, 2007 @ 1:00 pm

   ---

Leave a Comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.