Ayatollah Ahmadinejad Wins Pinko Peace Prize
April 8th, 2007 at 1:41 pm by SmantixI expect so much more than the chickenhawk argument from someone so gifted as to lovingly pound out 600 words on the cornbread that The Cooker on West End used to serve.
Because that, my friends, is rhetorical talent on loan from Staffmark.
/PREACH IT, SISTER! ™
UPDATE: Colonel Chickenhawk buc-buc-bucocks!
We showed weakness and will pay the price
By Patrick Mercer
Shiny new suits, goody bags, handshakes from a head of state and smiles (almost) all round.
Horseplay between young Brits completed what might have been the end of a package tour as the 15 sailors and marines from HMS Cornwall were returned by the grace and favour of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It was the perfect media coup for the Iranians until the almost simultaneous slaughter of four of our soldiers (two of them women) and a local interpreter burst onto our screens. The blood-spattered helmets and effects of our troops made a horrid contrast with the homecoming of our sailors.
During the Iran statement in the House of Commons last week I seemed to be the only person asking about the fate of our soldiers rather than our sailors. While the world’s media has been grabbed by the mercifully bloodless crisis of our sailors, our troops have had to face increasingly lethal attacks from Iranian-provided weapons in southern Iraq that have left many dead.
Thursday’s attack was just the latest improvised explosive device that, doubtless, has come across the border from Iran.
Bloodthirsty fowl!
April 8th, 2007 at 3:44 pm
Smantix,
Isn’t this airhead also fond of putting up 850 words on her shoe shopping expeditions?
I almost “trolled” over there…until I decided that would be the equivalent of the 6th grader going over to the kindergarten recess and stealing their kickball.
April 8th, 2007 at 4:24 pm
Yeah, but Ahmadinejad did dole out suits. Suits! If that doesn’t spell sincerity, then I need a new spell-checker… or at least need to outsource my spelling to Staffmark.
And who are we stuck with? An Abu Ghraibifying oil and humanity plunderer at his callous, hegemonic worst. The Brits were right to transform Iran’s littlest man to the region’s giant. America deserves it and so do the warmongers who think sailors should act like military men rather than publicity seeking weaklings cashing in on humility among a population hell bent on capitulation.
In fact, for the generous ensemble, we should give Iran The Bomb he seeks. It’s only fair.
April 8th, 2007 at 4:46 pm
Cowardly is having several websites and not enough Fallopia to call out whoever you’re referring to.
Or having a weekly segment on a local news network, and wasting the time on bullshit non-issues related to local & national politics.
Go on there and praise Iran’s magnanimous mullahs while in the same breath you are calling modern day conservatives “Iranians” as a pejorative and that they’re disappointed not enough blood was shed. Or ridiculing everyone 18-49 who supports the troops and their mission and isn’t there.
Go on tv and fucking say it if you believe it. Quit hiding behind cryptic little posts on your personal site. Speak Truth to Power, dammit! Quit laying down your beliefs for fear you won’t be able to make a down payment on a Saturn.
You won’t be fired. They’re practically begging you to say what they’re afraid to.
April 8th, 2007 at 6:13 pm
Pussies. Every one of them. They shamed the thousands of Royal Marines and Navy Corpsmen that gave their lives for the Union Jack and all the freedom and liberty that 3 generations have enjoyed since extinguishing the original Nazi Facists. Now, we see what years of pandering, dhimmitude, and complacency have accomplished. THE WHITE FLAG DISEASE. These Limeys will relish in all the celebrity that dishonor will vet them while the once-great British Empire succumbs to the egress of Islamo-Facism.
April 8th, 2007 at 7:03 pm
The jury is already in on Iran having nukes. Since the US and Israel have them, it’s only fair, that a 4′ 6″ megalomaniac who talks about the 12th imam wandering the earth with us this instant is going to help rid the world of the filthy Jews and their Zionist lackeys.
It’s the only fair thing to do. After all, we have them and we like sticking our big American warheads in everybody’s faces to get what we want. Blackmailing everyone with the threat of nuclear winter on a daily basis.
One thing I truly do admire is how before November it was Darfur! Darfur! Darfur! and by the way, what are we going to do about Darfur? Seems that whole situation has cleared up rather neatly in 4 months, no?
April 8th, 2007 at 11:48 pm
I’m with ya on the Darfur issue.
Here in Nashville, go see ‘They Came On Horseback’ on April 25. A Marine by the name of Brian Steidle was able to access places in Darfur where the media hasn’t been able to gain entrance. He took over 1000 photos, and I am hoping his film will be the film to finally move everyone to do something.
He also released a book two weeks ago with the same title.
What amazes me is how many people don’t know that it is Arab-Muslim terrorists committing the genocide in Darfur against blacks.
Where’s everyone on this?
April 9th, 2007 at 7:25 am
Where’s everyone on this?
Well, I’ll tell you Sharon. The denizens of Outter Leftardia have been screaming “chickenhawk” so long that they have painted themselves into a corner on any issue where you may think the US military should be involved.
If they support a military intervention anywhere and for any reason they are going to be faced with the same rote criticism that they’ve been clucking for the last 4 years.
“Chickenhawk!”
If you care so much – why aren’t you going there?
So what do your ideological soulmates do? They ignore it all together.
Which is exactly why Darfur dropped off the radar when the Democrats gained a thin majority. When faced with the option of stopping genocide, be it Rwanda, Darfur, Iraq or elsewhere they’d feel obliged to do no absolutely nothing.
April 9th, 2007 at 11:38 am
Sharon,
Let me just point out AGAIN that the Evangelical Christian community has been aware of the genocide in the Sudan for more than a decade now…and has been providing aid all along.
Franklin Graham went to the White House with this problem in ’98, but I guess the President was a little…uh…preoccupied.
Don’t rely on your liberal bretheren to keep pounding the Darfur drums. Most of them were only using the issue to show how mean and uncaring the conservatives in power were. Now that dhimmocrats have Congress, you can forget about any help there.
But you keep going, Sharon. I may not always agree with your politics, but I know you are committed on this issue…and I admire that.
April 9th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Sorry Smantix…Yiddish and I went over to Brittney’s site to beat up on some liberals. I invited one to come over here to run his drivel. So if a troll approcheth…
Of course we can blame you for linking us in the first place.
April 9th, 2007 at 7:23 pm
I don’t disagree with anyone over here about the Darfur issue. In fact,the people who have been most helpful to me in supplying me with information about Darfur and a potential trip there have been Sam Brownback and other conservatives.
However, Darfur is not a liberal or conservative issue. And I do think one can oppose the Iraq war (I do) and not be against military action elsewhere.
Smantix, you make a good point about boxing ourselves in a corner, which is why some time ago I tried to separate my belief about the war in Iraq and other potential wars.
Rwanda, Kosovo, Darfur have been a wakeup call for me. I used to refer to myself as a pacifist. I still believe love and peace is the answer to everything. It’s just that one day I realized not everyone believes love and peace is the answer to everything and if I go to Darfur and try to get everyone to hold hands and sing Kumbyah–well, it ain’t gonna work.
But there’s nothing wrong with working toward a world of love and peace. I’m less optimistic about that happening in my lifetime, but it should still remain a goal.