Preston Taylor Holmes
Knoxville, TN

The Cranky Neocon
Philadelphia, PA

Brian McMurphy
Nashville, TN

Michele
Knoxville, TN

Nigel
San Diego, CA

TinyElvis
The O.C., California

Yiddish Steel
San Diego, CA

Annika!
Parts Unknown, California



Headlines...

The Dirty Dozen...


6MB: The Sadie
Lou Interview


6MB Backup Site


All original content
© 2004 - 2009
Six Meat Buffet

All other content
© Someone Else

Terms of Use





















OK, Maybe Fred Thompson IS The Man

May 15th, 2007 at 1:24 pm by Cranky

This morning Drudge gave oxygen to Michael Moore by posting a letter from MM challenging Fred Thompson to a debate over healthcare and Cuba.

Normally, I would think that any attention one gives to Moore is too much. He sells his movies by manufacturing controversy.

However, not only does this video response by Thompson work mightily in putting the dog in his place, it will also boost Fred’s approvals through the roof.

Here’s the letter since Drudge’s Flashes dissappear:

**EXCLUSIVE: MICHAEL MOORE CHALLENGES FRED THOMPSON TO DEBATE
Tues May 15 2007 6:00:01 ET

LETTER:

May 15, 2007

Senator Fred Thompson
American Enterprise Institute
110 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036

Dear Senator Thompson,

Given that it has been publicly reported in The Weekly Standard, a leading neo-conservative publication, that you support Fidel Castro and the Cuban regime by being a purveyor of fine Cuban exports despite the trade embargo, I was surprised to see your recent op ed in a more traditional conservative outlet, The National Review, regarding my trip to Cuba (I suspect you choose The National Review in an effort to pander to an outlet that had criticized you for your opposition to medical malpractice legislation).

In your May 2, 2007 National Review article, “Paradise Island,” you specifically raised concerns about whether my trip to Cuba with 9/11 heroes, who have suffered serious health problems as a result of their exposure to toxic substances at Ground Zero that have gone untreated was somehow going to support Castro ad the Cuban government:

“It always leaves me shaking my head when I read about some big-time actor or director going to Cuba and gushing all over Castro.” [article]

Putting aside the fact that you, like the Bush Administration, seem far more concerned about the trip to Cuba than the health care of these 9/11 heroes, I was struck by the fact that your concerns (including comments about CastroÕs reported financial worth) apparently do not extend to your own conduct, as reported in The Weekly Standard’s April 23, 2007 story, “From the Courthouse to the White House Fred Thompson auditions for the leading role” (emphasis added):

“Thompson’s work space looks just like what the home office of a successful politician or CEO should look like — though a little messier: a large desk, dark wood, leather furniture, lots of books and magazines and newspapers, a flat-screen TV, and box upon box of cigars — Montecristos from Havana.” [article]

In light of your comments regarding Cuba and Castro, do you think the “box upon box of cigars — Montecristos from Havana” that you have in your office have contributed to CastroÕs reported wealth?

While I will leave it up to the conservatives to debate your hypocrisy and the Treasury Department to determine whether the “box upon box of cigars” violates the trade embargo, I hereby challenge you to a health care debate.

Survey after survey has indicated that health care is one of the top issues to the American voters. Today, more than 46 million people lack health are coverage, including 9 million children. We pay significantly more than any other country in the world — and get less back. Americans life expectancy is lower than other Ground Zero 9/11 workers live in a society where the Bush Administration has shown more concern about their travel than about their health.

Our debate would provide you an opportunity to appeal to the right wing of the Republican Party by continuing to attack me; it would give me a chance to discuss health care and tell you exactly what happened in Cuba, given your apparent inters; and it would provide the American people an opportunity to see just how serious Hollywood can be, with a purported conservative and an avowed progressive Hollywood personality on stage.

Over the course of the debate, we could specifically address the following issues:

(1) Your work as a lobbyist in light of the fact that the health care and insurance industries have maintained the current health care system through their effective control of the political establishment.

(2) The fact that you raised hundred of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the health care and insurance industries.

(3) Discuss the fact, highlighted in yet another conservative outlet The New York Sun, that you inexplicably wanted to cut funding for AIDS research. [article]

(4) Your relationship with the Frist family and by extension HCA, one of the nation’s largest for-profit hospital chains. It has been reported that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (who was renowned for his over-the-television-screen Schiavo diagnosis) is serving as one of your confidantes on your potential presidential campaign. The Frist family has historically controlled HCA, which paid a record $1.7 billion in civil and criminal fines, including a $631 million penalty for Medicaid fraud — in other words, ripping off the taxpayers.

(5) Discussing whether Arthur Branch, as the District Attorney of Manhattan, supports a woman’s right to choose, gun safety reforms, gay marriage, the trans fat ban and anti-smoking laws (which would impact Cuban cigars, including your Montecristos).

Like American Idol, we could even have the country vote to determine which one of us wins the debate. Though in the spirit of full disclosure, I feel obligated to forewarn you that I was the winner of the 1971-72 Detroit Free Press Debate Award for the state of Michigan.

The winner of our health care debate could even light a Victory cigar with one of your Montecristos (though we may want to consider shopping them to the safe house where I have put a master copy of SiCKO in the event that the Bush Administration tries to seize the film).

Sincerely,

Michael Moore

Sure to be a classic.

BTW, since Drudge and his close associate Breitbart seem to be the only people pushing this, I am slightly suspicious that this somehow is a setup.


11 Responses to “OK, Maybe Fred Thompson IS The Man”

  1. John Kaiser Says:

    “I am slightly suspicious that this somehow is a setup.”

    For what purpose?

  2. Cranky Says:

    John,

    That’s what I cannot figure out.

    I guess I mean in the Drudge provoking a fight for ratings.

    Although both Thompson and Moore will gain stature in their respective camps, I’m no conspiratorial to think that these two are doing an Andy Kaufman thing.

    But then again…

  3. michele Says:

    Waiting for Michael Moore to edit this video so that it appears Thompson threatened to send him to an institution for reprogramming.

  4. Schizo Steve Says:

    Of COURSE this is a conspiracy you sheeple.

    For those who are skeptics, good for you. We should all do our own research in regards to what is happening in Cuba. Five quick questions that can get your research started are as follows:

    1) What was Michael Moore talking about in this clip? OK, I can’t find the link…but I’ll get back to ya on that…

    2 )What did Fred Thompson do before and the years leading up to September, 11th?

    3) Who were the tenants of WTC Building 7?

    4) How did building 7 fall?

    5) Can you find video that shows a plane hitting the Pentagon?

    See…it’s all tied together. You are just too blind to see it.

    And you thought you’d banned me. Dylan Avery for President!

  5. Sharon Cobb Says:

    They’re both actors/filmmakers who are involved in politics.
    My dog has more credibility than either. (And probably would be liked more around the world than either of them as well)
    Michele-Mike’s film premieres at Cannes, and will open here June 29.

  6. Smantix Says:

    Fred is Information Age aware. His responses are direct and proportional.

    Get in the van, Cranky. Fred’s going to drive you to the White House.

  7. Dan Collins Says:

    What’s your dog’s view of immigration, Sharon?

  8. Sharon Cobb Says:

    Priceless, Dan!

  9. semanticleo Says:

    “Fred’s going to drive you to the White House.”

    Along with Miss Daisy.

  10. Swamp Rabbit Says:

    Michael Moore,, Hog Headed Bastard!

  11. Cranky Says:

    All your -headed b*stards are belong to us!