NAACP Arithmetic 101: Criminal = Victim
November 17th, 2007 at 11:26 am by Preston Taylor HolmesWhen the NAACP isn’t busy sharing kickbacks and blackmail funds with Jesse and Al, they’re usually somewhere crying racism! Just as they are in this case of instantaneous justice.
This may be one of the first cases to come out of California in a long time that actually makes sense. But not to the race whores, who are always quick to canonize a criminal of the right color, no matter their crime. (Tookie nods his rotting head from beyond the grave…)
“It was pandemonium” inside the house that night, District Attorney Jon Hopkins said. Hughes was responsible for “setting the whole thing in motion by his actions and the actions of his accomplices.”
Wait a minute. That sounds like straight-up common sense giving-credit-where-credit-is-due type stuff, a rarity for the Golden State. Somebody should have put Jon Hopkins on the original O.J. murder case and we might have had a shot at actual justice instead of race-based nullification. But, if there’s one thing that the race baiters hate, it’s accountability.
Brown and other NAACP officials are asking why the homeowner is walking free. Tests showed Edmonds had marijuana and prescription medication in his system the night of the shooting. Edmonds had a prescription for both the pot and the medication to treat depression.
“This man had no business killing these boys,” Brown said. “They were shot in the back. They had fled.”
Oh well, what’s another racist reverend in the long line of racist reverends. Here’s a tip for you future cadavers: even in the pansy-controlled state of Kalifornia, there are still those homeowners who dare defend themselves, so you may not want to break into people’s homes and threaten bodily harm. In this case, the homeowner fell one criminal short of a hat-trick, but hopefully the surviving perp will spend the rest of his unuseful life behind bars, if they can’t see fit to fry him, which we all know is highly unlikely.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
This is definitely racist. Three black kids singled out a white home in an affluent area for breaking and entering with intent to steal possessions. Had the home owner been white, this wouldn’t be an issue. The racism here of course is on the part of the black people protecting the criminals. I still say the Jena Six should have been tried for a hate crime as singling out a white student and stomping all over him falls under that definition, but alas, White Guilt rules the roost for way too many, even to the point where these people can’t even condemn a criminal.
-Caomhin
November 17th, 2007 at 5:47 pm
Rare robbery case brings cries of racism
…
Three young black men break into a white man’s home in rural Northern California. The homeowner shoo…
November 18th, 2007 at 10:46 am
And, just when you thought it couldn’t get any more absurd in the world of racial politics, the parents of Tawana Brawley sue to reopen her case: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312086,00.html
November 20th, 2007 at 11:04 pm
Tawana Brawley converted to Islam after meeting Farrakhanvict. Now mamma says she has a dog to bite any “white cops” who want to write on her and put feces in her hair.
I had not heard of this case before but the reaction from the Reverend and Hughes’ momma still surprised me. A gang breaks into a house, starts beating on a kid looking for dope, the father shoots two of the three not knowing what the hell they were going to do next and it’s “a legal lynching” from momma’s POV.
Yea, momma’s mad that her son will be held responsible for getting his two friends killed by inciting a home invasion. She should be charged too. It’s her fault she shit out and then raised such a miserable bastard. She should be embarrassed to show her face on tv but I’m sure MC Reverend Gropes-a-Lot has convinced her that she’s gonna be rich.
November 21st, 2007 at 9:12 am
So justice is served. Give the homeowner a medal. Charge the “Race Hustlers”, as accessories after the fact.