Per Charlie Gibson’s opening query in the Democrat debate on ABC – Obama wants to invade a sovereign country and bomb Pakistan with or without their permission to go after al Qaeda because there is no doubt that they are in Northwest Pakistan, everyone knows it, and would do so as soon as he has “actionable intelligence”.

I don’t think there is a Republican candidate on today’s stage with the balls to suggest that action.

Bill Richardson, a duly-noted assbag, thinks that we should side with the Pakistani people against Musharraf. Even though they mainly hate us?

According to poll results, bin Laden has a 46 percent approval rating. Musharraf’s support is 38 percent.

I like diplomatic roulette as much as the next suicidal sociopath but seriously – you go first.

Oh, and we should stop the North Koreans from getting loose nukes. He did so well at that the first time. After all, he’s The Experience Candidate. He has experience failing. Watch the dangerous naivete of that Youtube video with the hindsight of North Korea’s 2006 nuclear test.

On the bright side, he did pay Kim Jong Il $25 Million dollars for the bodies of six soldiers from the war. Because that’s not funding terrorism.

Clinton on the surge: It has failed. As long as the Iraqi Congress does not hold hands and make-out for six months then we have failed. Way to move those goalposts.

Richardson on the surge: We should get out of this war and have a regional solution that the Iranians and Syrians will get onboard with. Because we need to be talking about healthcare in the U.S. *pfew*

Obama on the war, not so much the surge: Violence was quelled because Democrats were elected in 2006. *make passionate hand gestures and look serious*

Clinton on the 2000 election: People voted for the guy they wanted to have a beer with and now they know that was the wrong choice.

Let me explain something, the alcohol does not play as big a part in that oft thrown about phrase as much as that the candidate is approachable and someone you could relate to on a one-to-one level. Mrs. Rodham-Clinton has convinced me that she is not that candidate. Mission accomplished.

Per Clinton on “experiencing” “change”: She’s has the experience that was responsible for balancing the budget and creating an imaginary surplus that was going to go on long passed the tech bubble bust 7 years ago. If she’s going to take credit for what her husband claims he did, will she also admit that she had sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky?

John Edwards should be able to set our energy policy because he was born a coal miner’s daughter.

And thank Gaia, it’s over.

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 5th, 2008 at 9:11 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.