R-E-S-P-E-C-T Buys My New H-D-T-V
April 2nd, 2008 at 9:17 pm by BrianI couldn’t resist this story today on the triumph of Equal Rights ™ in our courts. And I’m not just posting this story because I’m a sweetback firing a financial salvo across Mrs. McMurphy’s ample budgetary bow:
Modern Males Say Living Off the Ex-Wife Is No Cause for Shame
By Anita Raghavan
As a Hollywood actor, John David Castellanos is protective of his image. He stays in phenomenal shape and looks much younger than his 50 years.
But he admits to a fact that might be considered unflattering: He receives alimony from his former wife. To be exact, $9,000 a month.
Thank you for understanding, Gloria.
In the nearly 30 years since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against gender discrimination in alimony, few male beneficiaries have stepped forward to talk about it.
[...]
But today’s men are shaking off the stigma of being supported by their ex-wives. Several agreed to talk on the record for this article, in part because they say the popular image of the male alimony recipient is unfair: He’s not always a slacker.
I highlight this as I live in a state that gives new houses and cars to women who only serve a few months at Club Med(ication) after disconnecting the telephone and shotgun slaying their husbands in the back while they are asleep.
Until we can walk into a courtroom secure in the knowledge that merely being born with a vagina does not make you a better parent or until we can also kill all of our spouses with impunity – can we ever be truly equal?











April 2nd, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Word!
I pay an ungawdly amount of vagimony every month to a conniving, twit of a woman that refuses to find gainful, full-time employment thanks to the scales of justice here in the “Golden State”. You want true equality, tell a woman to go get a f*kk!n’ job, and support her own damn self when the marital train to “Blissville” makes a sudden stop in “Irreconcirable Differences Acres”.
April 3rd, 2008 at 7:25 am
We’ve got a judge here who is a notorious phallophobe. If it’s a custody case, the woman would have to be more than just an irresponsible, criminal, dope addict on probation to be deemed unfit to parent.
We seem to be laboring under “Equal Rights” when it’s convenient.
April 3rd, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Yiddish Steel-
You sure we didn’t marry the same woman?