Comments on: Today’s $64k Question

By: Cranky

Cranky — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:41:35 +0000

You need only see this to understand the mind-blowing implications:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmHTXiNNO48

By: Trish

Trish — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:33:51 +0000

Listen, just because it looks “anatomically correct” (and I don’t remember seeing that part of Arnold) doesn’t mean it can perform like the real thing. C’mon, how intelligent is “artificial intelligence”? Why should other artificial things work any better?

By: The Maximum Leader

The Maximum Leader — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:13:45 +0000

In the movies Arnold and that Kristiana Lokken woman both looked anatomically correct…

They do have to be able to “pass” for human. One supposes that the machines are insidious enough to figure out that humans are voyeurs.

By: Trish

Trish — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:13:48 +0000

Genuine stupidity would be my guess.

How do we know that such an act is even possible? Where would they get that parts to build that part, if you catch my drift?

By: The Maximum Leader

The Maximum Leader — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:40:17 +0000

Most likely mortal sin on par with Onanism.

The certain death part is there too… So being intimate with a terminator is as deadly as it is sexy…