Preston Taylor Holmes
Knoxville, TN

The Cranky Neocon
Philadelphia, PA

Brian McMurphy
Nashville, TN

Nigel
San Diego, CA

TinyElvis
The O.C., California

Yiddish Steel
San Diego, CA

Annika!
Parts Unknown, California



Headlines...

The Dirty Dozen...


6MB: The Sadie
Lou Interview


6MB Backup Site


All original content
© 2004 - 2009
Six Meat Buffet

All other content
© Someone Else

Terms of Use





















Spin Baby Spin

October 27th, 2008 at 1:34 pm by Cranky

If you are an unhinged lefty, you know, the type that posts at The DailyKos or The Boston Herald, then you might think that Obama’s socialist creds are no big deal.

Here’s the smoking gun, in case you missed it.

But what about those fearful, ignorant voters? You would probably go to DefCon 5 trying to spin that 1. Obama’s no Socialist and 2. even if he was, it what’s so wrong about that?

I’ll skip the DU bat-sh*t crazy because, well, how seriously would you take a 15 year-old anarcho-syndicalist? However, let’s see what a reputable paper [guffaw] says.

Conservative bloggers and websites have been flogging it, and now John McCain’s campaign has put its imprimatur on it: a newly disclosed radio interview in which Democratic rival Barack Obama talks about the redistribution of wealth.

The interview, first reported by the Drudge Report, was with a Chicago radio station while he was an Illinois state senator on Sept. 6, 2001.

Obama is talking about the victories of the civil rights movement, and says, “You know if you look at the victories and the failures of the Civil Rights movement and its litigation strategy in the Court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I would be okay. But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society…. And one of the I think the tragedies of the Civil Rights movement was because the Civil Rights movement became so court focused I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.”

The entire context of the interview isn’t clear, and the sentiment isn’t all that different from Martin Luther King Jr., who after the voting rights and other accomplishments of the 1960s civil rights movement moved toward greater emphasis on poverty and economic justice.

Well, gollee Martin Luther King Jr. said something like that. Know what that makes you? (hint: starts with an “r” and it’s been played ad nauseum).

To defuse this bomb, Cass Sunstein spins it to sound like this is a basically conservative ideal and I don’t know why the fuss.

“What the critics are missing is that the term ‘redistribution’ didn’t mean in the Constitutional context equalized wealth or anything like that. It meant some positive rights, most prominently the right to education, and also the right to a lawyer,” Sunstein said. “What he’s saying – this is the irony of it – he’s basically taking the side of the conservatives then and now against the liberals.”

Positive rights, like the right to own a home regardless of income, the right to vote regardless of being alive and of course, the right to some of Joe the Plumber’s future cash.


One Response to “Spin Baby Spin”

  1. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Says:

    Obama Offers ‘Closing Argument’ In Ohio…

    Barack Obama argues that voters there have a chance to reject “politics that would divide a nation j…

professional resume writing services