Texas Planned Parenthood Branch: We Need More Abortions!
November 2nd, 2009 at 10:41 pm by NigelBecause advising young mothers of their other options just isn’t profitable enough. Man, who would think the Bushitler recession would hit the “reproductive health” industry so hard?:
So the director can’t handle Planned Parenthood’s profit motive or the viewing of an ultrasound of a… young baby lump of flesh being ripped from the mother’s inconvenienced woman’s womb.
So after some prayer and contemplation, she joins the pro-life group down the street.
So what does Planned Parenthood of Bryan, Texas do?
They sue her.
On Friday both Johnson and the Coalition For Life were issued temporary restraining orders filed by Planned Parenthood.
Rochelle Tafolla, a Planned Parenthood spokesperson issued the following statement: “We regret being forced to turn to the courts to protect the safety and confidentiality of our clients and staff, however, in this instance it is absolutely necessary.”
The temporary restraining order contends that Planned Parenthood would be irreparably harmed by the disclosure of certain information, but does not bar Johnson or Coalition For Life volunteers from the premises.
Yeah, I guess non-profit, taxpayers-subsidized Planned Parenthood isn’t too pleased about that revelation that they need abortions to make a…er…profit.
November 2nd, 2009 at 10:59 pm
So how do you become the director of any Planned Parenthood branch without knowing what an abortion is? It’s like becoming the ringmaster at the circus and discovering that you hate beating the elephants and selling drugs to the carnies.
It’s acceptable premeditated murder for the crowd that’s only pro-life when someone has been sentenced to death by the state.
We’ve got to see the flag-draped coffins coming back from Iraq or Afghanistan but you’ll never see the tv cameras filming the dumpster out behind the Planned Parenthood clinic.
November 2nd, 2009 at 11:21 pm
How many “pro-choice” women would change their positions if they could actually see how barbaric the procedure is?
And how many would change their ideological position once they realize that Planned Parenthood is not about providing women with information and options, but is really all about the Benjamins?
And how many “pro-choice” women even know who Margaret Sanger was and how racist and fundamentally evil her beliefs were?
November 3rd, 2009 at 1:04 am
Nigel,
They know. They just twist it so it doesn’t matter to them.
November 3rd, 2009 at 10:22 am
Seeing abortion up close has led a few people with souls come around. “Jane Roe” of Roe v. Wade has a great story. So does Dr. Bernard Nathanson, an abortion doctor who ended up producing “Silent Scream”. Folks that the ghouls of PP wish didn’t exist.
November 3rd, 2009 at 1:21 pm
Good point, Nigel. Margaret Sanger was in favor of abortion to get rid of the “undesirables”*. She was EVIL.
Now it is the sacrament of the Democrat Party. There is federal funding in the healthcare bill for abortions so we call ALL pay for the murder of innocents in the womb.
There is something very, very wrong here.
*look it up and you will see who she felt were undesirables
November 3rd, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Here’s a link that I have in my blogroll. http://www.cbrinfo.org/
Here is their blog: http://abortionno.org/blog/
These are the folks who have the “GAP” displays on college campus locations across the country and also have the box trucks and airplane banners with the pictures of aborted fetuses on them. Even some pro-life folks are against the use of this in the struggle against abortion. No one can deny that seeing is more powerful than talking about this issue.
That being said, I agree with Nigel’s points in #2 above. One of the many ironies of Margaret Sanger’s legacy is the establishment of many Planned Parenthood offices in economically depressed neighborhoods where the genocide of minorities is propagated, just as she would have wanted it to be.