Rich White Woman Marries Rich White Man In Historic Wedding
July 31st, 2010 at 11:32 am by BrianUPDATED: Sorry fellas, this one’s taken.
You had your chance.
News Or Not News?
Dog bites man? Not news.
Man bites dog? News.
Dog marries dog? Cute local filler story.
Dog marries man? Historic world news (via Newsbusters):
It’s “royal.” It’s of “historic proportions.” It’s Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, and CBS apologizes for letting actual news get in the way of its breathless coverage.
Anchoring the coverage in Rhinebeck, Early Show weekend co-host Erica Hill, after referring to the event as “America’s royal wedding,” threw it back to a remorseful Chris Wragge in the studio, who promised to get back to Erica in “just a couple of minutes” after a couple of news items “we have to address.” When she got the ball back, Hill described the wedding as being of “historic proportions.”
Government work really does pay well for two lifelong civil servants to afford a $5,000,000 wedding. But should she wear an off-white collar from Oscar de la Renta?
So much for all that “Two Americas” talk that was so popular with our class warring brethren. How many Gulf Coast fishermen could that feed? How many poor, despondent 9/11 first responders? Or more appropriately for Frau Clinton, how many pets from a Sarah McLachlan ASPCA animal cruelty commercial could it save from the merciful death panels we all will enjoy soon enough?
After all, hetero marriage is just modern slavery. Wonderfully ornate and consensual slavery blessed by Vera Wang herself.
Our bosoms swell with pride that in a time of record unemployment, a collapsing economy, two wars and a DMZ on our southern border that a rich white woman and a rich white man can show us that the world can still be full of beauty if you have stolen enough money from the taxpayers to insulate yourself from it.
How does this escape the narrative? Apparently, the Clinton/Mezvinsky arrangement is supposed to create a genetically enhanced Super Kleptocrat capable of not knowing the definition of the word “is” in addition to being a “bipolar, one man crime wave”:
Edward Mezvinsky’s son, Marc, is engaged to Chelsea Clinton, daughter of former U.S President Bill Clinton and current U.S. Secretary of State and former U.S Senator from New York Hillary Rodham Clinton.[3]
…
Criminal activities
Mezvinsky was involved in a series of business transactions that ultimately led to his downfall. Prosecutors later would call him a one-man crime wave.[1] In 2000, after examining his business deals since 1980, prosecutors said that they uncovered elements of fraud in nearly every one.[1]
In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 charges of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.[4] Nearly $10 million was involved in the crimes. Shortly after his indictment, he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, but the judge at his trial disallowed a mental illness defense.[1] Mezvinsky was released from federal prison on April 11, 2008.[5]
July 31st, 2010 at 12:36 pm
I have no love or respect for the Clintons and I agree the cost of this wedding, which we do NOT know the cost, could support my family for a long time.
I see no reason to carp about either of these young peoples parents when writing about this wedding. Especially Mr. Mezvinsky’s father. I do not believe Mr. Mezvinsky Jr. has been accused of any crime, so why does his father’s crimes have to be rehashed every time the wedding is mentioned? I also find it deploreable that Ms. Clinton must take abuse due to her parents being unpopular, they may be guilty of many things, but Ms. Clinton is NOT.
Why can not you so called journalists let her day be a happy one?
July 31st, 2010 at 1:42 pm
I’m sure you have no love for those Clintons. Sure of it.
Her “one happy day”. Lady, her’s has been one happy life. Trailer Park Princess. Kid gloves treatment since the day.
She’s getting her Master’s in Public Health from Columbia. Tell me, how many people could $5M help if that’s truly an issue you care about versus flying “oh-so concerned about global warming” Hollyweird private jetset crowd up to the Hamptons on the Hudson to celebrate the joining of two organized crime families.
It’s like The Godfather except the pasta has been replaced by hot wings and potato latkes.
Both of these full-grown adults’ privileged lives are nothing more than the profit reaped from two Democrat arch-criminal families. Bernie Maddow’s surviving family should get such swell treatment. And I’m sure no one would mention their father or the people he ripped off if they were having a multi-million dollar wedding.
July 31st, 2010 at 1:43 pm
Grace…
How DARE you come in here and call us dirty names?!?!
“Journalists”?
You cut deeeep.
August 1st, 2010 at 2:21 pm
B-Mac…did you p-shop that photo of Chelsea? Now being honest here…I’ve never found Chelsea to be repulsive…in fact when I was single and she was in her early 20s I admit that I would have “gone there”.
But seriously…are her chompers that “beaver-like” ?(btw, a free Rubios Fish Taco plate to anyone who can “gloss” that reference…IYKWIMAITYD).
Isn’t a bride supposed to look her BEST on her wedding day?
Am I pissing Michele off here by being my typical male pig-dog self?
August 1st, 2010 at 3:29 pm
I don’t know what’s so offensive about your comment. That *is* her best. Besides, beavers possess a very strong work ethic.
I personally do not know of any that went to graduate school to study architecture in order to build beaver dams for the less fortunate and then spent $5,000,000 on an apartment on Park Avenue but they could be out there.
August 1st, 2010 at 5:29 pm
I am PROUD of your remarks about hetero marriage being modern slavery blessed by Vera Wang. It only seems appropriate to phrase and paraphrase the words of feministas at a time like this. We expect Jenna Bush (whose wedding was about 100 grand), the daughter of a “convervative,” to be dominated by the patriarchy in her thinking and to want, voluntarily, to enter into a hetero marriage. But, Chelsea?
By the way, what the hell IS marriage between same sex couples? Which “man” is the slave in a gay marriage? Which “wife” is the slave in a lesbian marriage? Once again, by going beyond one man, one woman, one marriage, we end up with nothing but confusion. Imagine what children will think a decade or two from now. Who is who? What is what? Oh, that’s right. All will be cleared up. The Muslims are coming.
August 2nd, 2010 at 11:21 am
I’m so glad to see Web Hubbell’s daughter getting married.
August 2nd, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Nigel – “Beaver-like Chompers”: Circa 1994, Jim Rome Show – Referring to Monica Seles.
August 2nd, 2010 at 1:53 pm
Yid, I should have exempted you…but you win.
We’ll have to get together for lunch sometime as soon as Nigel Jr. allows me…
August 2nd, 2010 at 9:53 pm
Fer shure! Since a Fish Taco Plate at Rubio’s is the wager, let’s have it at the original on Grand Ave. in Pacific Beach.
August 3rd, 2010 at 11:49 am
Will the groom finally be allowed new glasses now the knot has been tied?
August 6th, 2010 at 8:39 pm
I’m late to this party. Saturday the 31st I was at a wedding and I am now getting caught up on my reading. (For the record, the wedding was in Dallas)
The way the US Pravda creamed themselves about it, was the irony lost that it occured on the 13th anniversary of Princess Diana’s demise in the Paris tunnel?
We know Soros’ hand was involved in this spectacle as well as illuminati-Goldman Sachs influence. One thing in all of the Lewinsky coverage was lost, however: did Uncle Larry give Marc 2 bags before they left on the honeymoon?
August 7th, 2010 at 12:10 am
Sorry, guys, I was a month off from the Diana reference. I lose my mind over fish tacos, although I suspect Marc joins Weiner in the Beard Club…