Santorum Finally Drops Trou And Waves His Raging Social Conservatism In Our Faces
March 16th, 2012 at 1:13 am by BrianAnd isn’t that what the public is clamoring for? A nosey, self-righteous, decidedly anti-libertarian prig longing to usurp the mantle of the Meese Commission while our country teeters on the brink of economic collapse?
Stacey McCain is the only kind of McCain I like but this excited defense of Santorum’s snooping streak doesn’t help anyone:
Yes, this is what Santorum says in a statement, one of about two dozen issue-oriented statements on the “Where I Stand” page of his campaign’s Web site. The statement is clear: Santorum wants to enforce laws that the Obama Administration has refused to enforce.
Would you like me to be more specific — because I could, y’know — about some of the clearly illegal obscenity now available online? Perhaps Jedediah Bila or Judson Phillips should contact former Attorney General Ed Meese or former Justice Department official Mark Levin and ask them about this subject. Because I’m reasonably sure that a whole lot of things now available online are, in fact, illegal.
Do we really need to re-fight what prurient community interest standards again? These aren’t the old days where that shady shop with the tinted windows and neon lights needed to be harangued into the shitty part of town so all the rich people could drive 20 miles out of their way to buy a skin mag and protect their property values.
You pick your battles. While the decline of Western Civilization can be easily accessed by anyone with a $15 internet connection and a curiosity for just how many thick cuts of manmeat some young, sexually empowered feminist can plug into her adventurous pooter at one time, it takes someone as self-righteous as Santorum to decide he wants to play King Pyhrrus and electively fight his way to the top of that sweaty pile of fun flesh to count them on the public dime.
For the children no doubt. The little lambs shepherded to safety by the self-anointed Smut Smasher.
Like investigating steroids in baseball, Congress should spend the first six months of the Santorum presidency *shudder* hanging out at strip clubs watching reel after reel at Xhamster and Youporn to determine how many dicks is too many in a gangbang. And how many are just right for Goldilock’s gash.
How can I put this politely? Ah! Let’s try this: What you want to do with that baseball bat in the privacy of your own home is strictly up to you, but the video is illegal obscenity.
Did that help clarify the issue somewhat?
…
Remember that Rick Santorum has a law degree and spent 16 years in Congress drafting legislation. He knows the law, and he knows the Constitution, and he knows doggone well that the First Amendment wasn’t intended to protect the kind of filth that’s on the Web nowadays.
So, yes, Santorum promised “vigorous” enforcement to shut down operators who are profiting from commerce in illegal obscenity, and you may agree or disagree with that. But this isn’t an issue that Santorum raised during a stump speech yesterday or that is the subject of his newest campaign ad.
No one’s asked him recently. Ask him now. See how far he wants to take it. I’m guessing to third base on the first interview.
So Santorum would not have an issue with a crowdsourced pornography site where users submitted their own videos and weren’t paid for them. Because the commerce from perceived illegal obscenity is what gives rise to government investigation? This veers into Tipper Gore parental advisory sticker territory. What starts out as wanting to protect little Suzie and Bobby from ever stumbling onto Max Hardcore’s oeuvre (NSFW) quickly devolves into an inquisition of Dee Snider as to why he wants to rock and/or whether or not he will be able to take it (short answer: No, he ain’t gonna take it.)
Filth is in the eye of the beholder and I think everyone knows that Santorum would see filth as masturbation, premarital sex and non-procreative marital sex to music from anyone other than Pat Boone. Every time you enter the Missus, you needed to be aiming for baby.
Not to conflate the issues as to whether the Establishment Republicans have the fix in against Santorum – they do. And Gingrich. And Paul. The unholy pentagram of Drudge, Ann Coulter, Mitt Romney, National Review and Barbara Bush have all bathed in the blood of goat sacrifice while listening to Ozzy Osbourne’s “Suicide Solution” to ensure that no one but Romney gets to wear the horns and carry the pitchfork at the Republican convention.
Are the attacks on Santorum coordinated by the Establishment? Almost certainly.
Are the assertions true that Santorum would use the presidency to enforce his brand of Big Government “I know what’s best for your personal / spiritual life” social conservatism? Definitely.
From Santorum’s website:
Enforcing Laws Against Illegal Pornography
America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography. A wealth of research is now available demonstrating that pornography causes profound brain changes in both children and adults, resulting in widespread negative consequences. Addiction to pornography is now common for adults and even for some children. The average age of first exposure to hard-core, Internet pornography is now 11. Pornography is toxic to marriages and relationships. It contributes to misogyny and violence against women. It is a contributing factor to prostitution and sex trafficking.
Every family must now be concerned about the harm from pornography. As a parent, I am concerned about the widespread distribution of illegal obscene pornography and its profound effects on our culture.
Pornography, not illegal pornography mind you, just plain-assed pornography – it’s ruining marriages and causes brain damage. The science is settled! This isn’t about “obscenity”. This is about Rick Santorum deciding that pornography period is not good for anyone and by gum he’s going to nip this in the bud.
I don’t know how many holes a bud has but, gee willikers, Santorum is more than ready to shove the hard cock of big government into as many of them are necessary to fuck the freedom out of the first amendment and get us all holding hands and smooching on the couch in between Family Feud and when we go to bed at a decent hour.










March 16th, 2012 at 7:03 pm
Yes because he absolutely turned the state of Pennsylvania into an absolute theocracy with all of these prudish laws he proposed while he was a Senator, didn’t he?
Oh. He didn’t?
Well, then …
March 17th, 2012 at 7:59 am
Turns out that Romney and other republican candidate have had the proposal to enforce pornography laws since January. Against Santorum it was a dishonest hit piece.
See here.
March 17th, 2012 at 9:01 am
Does a national Senator vote in the Pennsylvania state legislature?
Uh, no.
Viewing the comments on this quasi-nonstory has shown Santorum supporters are as thin-skinned to criticism as Senator Charlie Church himself.
At least I wasn’t accused of being a Romney supporter.
March 17th, 2012 at 10:21 am
I’m certainly more of a social-Con than Brian, but we agree on the fundamental fact that the only thing that matters in this election – and every one going forward – is fixing the economy and the national debt. We are on an economic sled we can’t steer sliding down an icy neighborhood street which empties into a crowded 8-lane freeway and the GOP wants to talk about smut? If we don’t fix our national finances nothing else is going to matter, except how much ammo you have and how long you can keep yourself alive during the meltdown. There isn’t a GOP candidate on the ballot worth pissing on right now, which only cements the theory that they want us to keep playing the Republican vs. Democrat game while the powers-that-be line their pockets and ignore the freight train coming down the tracks. Because it’s the middle class tied to the tracks, not them.
March 17th, 2012 at 11:06 am
What’s dishonest about it? Sure Gingrich and Romney had statements about tackling illegal porn in their mission statements but Santorum went much further than they did which tipped his hand to what he’s really concerned about. Re-fighting The Culture War.
When Democrats held the majority and the Presidency, they ramrodded socialized healthcare down everybody’s throats. Polls be damned. They got shellacked in 2010 and have soldiered on in their media bubble none the wiser.
When Republicans held a majority and the Presidency, they fucked around on Terry Schiavo for a year of it. Not rolling back the alphabet soup of government agencies or doing even the work that James O’Keefe did against taxpayer funded liberal advocacy groups.
This is about priorities. Nobody is giving these guys serious scrutiny because the media is delighted that either Santorum or Romney win.
It doesn’t matter if we’re talking about Mitt’s mormoninity or Sanpornum. Having debates run by Democrats and nothing but photo ops and sterile state caucus afterparties may be lulling you into a false sense of security but I think all of these candidate suck and are too weak and flawed to unite everybody against Obama.
Porn isn’t Santorum’s biggest weakness. His hubris is. And big government moderates with a hard social conservative streak don’t blow my skirt up. It’s the worst of both worlds.
Obviously, me and Arlen Specter would differ on that point.