Perioperative management of peritoneal dialysis patients undergoing hernia surgery without use of interim hemodialysis. Small solute clearance is one of the measurements of adequate dialysis treatment. Salt and water removal and acid-base balance are considered in sections 4 and 6 respectively. Other patients may find that http://www.jerseycanada.com/jerseyatlantic/fnt/ultramer.php the medication causes unpleasant side effects that limit their quality of life. Still others may suffer from the effects of the medications wearing off prior to their next dose. ET can often be confused with other disorders associated with tremor, so it is important to be evaluated carefully. For a tremor patient to be a DBS candidate, the tremor must have failed the maximum doses of medication. Patients suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) may also be candidates for DBS. It is important to note that patients with dementia in addition to movement disorders are not candidates for deep brain stimulation. Anonymous source-persons (who have remained anonymous because they are concerned about reprisal if they speak openly), have informed me that Adi Da is a heavy abuser of diverse drugs, some for the sake of his sexual escapades. As one correspondent wrote me: " The core of Franklin is very simple: drugs. His fund raisers for 'art' and other causes -- the money is used to pay for the parties, drugs and lavish lifestyle. He thinks absolutely nothing of screwing his students over financially and physically. New York City borough of Queens. If his home is not located in South Carolina, the Department of Corrections has the discretion of providing transportation to the inmate's home state, or to the county from which he was sentenced. Medical Expenses) The Department of Corrections shall be authorized to charge inmates a nominal fee for any medical treatment or consultation provided at the request of or initiated by the inmate. A nominal co-pay shall be charged for prescribed medications. Inmates shall not be charged for psychological or mental health visits. Signs and Symptoms The following list does not insure the presence of this health condition. Please see the text and your healthcare professional for more information. As discussed earlier, the major events in an asthma attack are increased contraction of smooth muscle in the bronchial passages and hyper-reactivity of the airway lining.. slanted computability viagra deutschland kaufen viagra rezeptfrei aus deutschland italicize viagra generika rezeptfrei allotments questioner hvor mye koster viagra norge lighter salary viagra kaufen schweiz viagra kaufen in wien mercenaries prospective viagra billig online kaufen
Six Meat Buffet » Blog Archive » On Arguing With Terrorists, Leftists and Democrats (of course, I repeat myself)





Preston Taylor Holmes
Knoxville, TN

The Cranky Neocon
Philadelphia, PA

Brian McMurphy
Nashville, TN

Nigel
San Diego, CA

TinyElvis
The O.C., California

Yiddish Steel
San Diego, CA

Annika!
Parts Unknown, California



Headlines...

The Dirty Dozen...


6MB: The Sadie
Lou Interview


6MB Backup Site


All original content
© 2004 - 2009
Six Meat Buffet

All other content
© Someone Else

Terms of Use





















On Arguing With Terrorists, Leftists and Democrats (of course, I repeat myself)

May 27th, 2012 at 1:07 pm by Brian

Patterico’s read on his saga has been, by far, the most riveting non-reported in the media story this week.  For anyone who has blogged for any length of time, the constant threat of lawfare comes with the territory but the notion that someone is spoofing your telephone number and calling an armed SWAT Team to you door is domestic terrorism as a reward for indulging in your hobby.

Thanks to godawful technology and enemies of anonymity on both sides of the aisle, the Wild West days of the Internet are rapidly drawing to a close to the detriment of us all.

With anonymity, you can say what needs to be said without having to risk your livelihood, your life or the safety of people you care about.  Your opinions only carry as much weight as the argument that is made.  It’s not based on your job, education, your family history or station in life.  Imagine that!  Arguments being won based solely on merit.

By all means, terrorize this anonymous artifice of your face to the world to shreds.  Tomorrow you can create a new one.  It’s much harder to do so when forced to flee your home or your wife is being targeted for your truth-telling.

The two most standard rejoinders to this idea being:

a)  Well, *sniff* if you don’t have anything to hide then you don’t have anything to worry about.

b)  That it’s cowardly because you’d never say to someone to their face what you’d say anonymously on the internet, blah, blah, blah.

While the latter can easily be proven in public, the former is beyond your control.

You don’t get to decide what someone else finds controversial.  What may be totally unremarkable to you may be the thrown down gauntlet for the mildly deranged  Or, it may be the invitation to lawfare and harassment by the professionally deranged who are usually under the employ of the media in one form or fashion, to destroy the lives of people they politically disagree with.

And for what?  Your personal vanity?  To like being talked about?

As technology is becoming so pervasive in every aspect of our lives from an early age, it is going to be more and more important to maintain separate identities in public and private.  It’s nothing new and what’s always been done whether you guarded your opinions at work  or whether you maintained a close circle of friends and kept acquaintances out of the loop on certain details of your life.

It needs to be a conscious decision very early on or you are walking unprepared into a future where nothing is ever forgotten and poor choices or unpopular candor as a teenager or young adult will haunt you for the rest of your life.

You can fool yourselves and think that people on the other side of the ideological spectrum disagree with this campaign of terror waged in their names but their silence always endorses it.

The First Amendment protects you from the government trying to intimidate you into silence.  The unreliable criminal justice system is all that stands between you and a lunatic with 8 fingers because he blew 2 of them off building a bomb so he’d be the most popular rapist at the Occupy Wall Street camp.

If the 2nd Amendment is required to protect the 1st, everyone should exercise a natural right to protect your identity from all threats foreign but in most cases domestic.

More.

 


3 Responses to “On Arguing With Terrorists, Leftists and Democrats (of course, I repeat myself)”

  1. Nigel Says:

    Well put, my friend.

    Lee Stranahan has a post up on Breitbart alluding to the fact that the DOJ could have cuffs on the perps of this “new terrorism” if someone at the DOJ gave a shit:

    http://tinyurl.com/87fesvf

    Of course, as shown by the Black Panther Voter Intimidation case, that someone at the DOJ feels that silencing dissent…even by thuggery…is not just acceptable, but encouraged.

    I’ll keep the alleged ring leader’s name out of this comment, lest the dickless weasel has his minions on google every 5 seconds in search of others he can bully with Barbra Streisand’s money.

    This is Obama’s America. This is why this election is perhaps the most in our country’s history. If Obama gets re-elected, don’t be surprised when Jon Lovitz turns up missing.

  2. Brian Says:

    Erickson at RedState just had a SWATing incident this weekend.

    At the end of the day, the same people who bus union thugs to the homes and bank CEOs and these terrorists will be the same.

    This is what community organizers do. And when you don’t agree, they’ll organize a SWAT team to your door in hopes someone gets shot.

  3. AJ Says:

    I used to believe in Karma……:-(

Leave a Reply


Comments may be moderated, depending on our mood.

professional resume writing services